Whoah! Why did no one tell me how awesome this movie was? I remember it coming out, and I remember people going to see it and coming back to my apartment where I was most likely planted at the table staring intensely at Plutarch's Life of Antony and surrounded by Greek lexicons, my eyes glazed over and soulless, and I remember those people uttering ambiguous "It was good" statements. But I don't remember anyone ever saying, "Acree, seriously, you need to get up and see this movie RIGHT NOW."
"But I have to--"
"NO! SEE IT!"
"But Octavia--"
"I don't care! This is not like the other Harry Potter adaptations, which were really just masterbatory wish-fulfillments meant to sustain our fan fever until the next installment was released, and which might as well have been called Harry Potter Does Hollywood. This is an actual MOVIE. Like, with a director."
"We're serious."
I will probably come down off my high in a couple of days and get some perspective on The Order of the Phoenix, but right now I'm still on my broomstick with Fred and George (who I knew all along were secretly hot!) watching Dolores Umbridge's wall of decrees come toppling down with her dignity.
Director David Yates (and/or Michael Goldenberg, who wrote the screenplay) thankfully did away with many J.K. Rowlingisms that weighed down Book V (especially for haters like Shoshi): Harry being constantly berated by classmates; Harry brooding over his dead parents; Harry taking six million trips to Umbridge's office to undergo minor torture. In the book, Umbridge became too oppressive and Harry too downtrodden, so that they nearly sucked the enjoyability out of the awesome parts: the Order of the Phoenix, Sirius Black's family mansion, Snape's ever-increasing complexity. But Yates insinuates these longer trends with short, effective scenes, rather than beating us over the head and wasting precious minutes of screen time.
I thought this installment managed Harry's flashbacks better than any of the others. For the first time, his smiling parents actually lent poignancy, rather than cheese. (Who else thought Lily Potter looked an awful lot like Pam from The Office?) I was worried that [as if anyone doesn't already know] SPOILER ALERT Sirius's death would result in the typical swelling music and "NOOOOOOOO!" of the past four movies, but the moment manages some real gravity without halting the action. (Harry still has to face Voldemort!)
To a non-film buff it seems like David Yates came out of nowhere. Does anyone have the 411 on him?
Some regrets:
--Too bad they didn't show the Quibbler acting as the alternative newspaper to the Ministry-controlled Prophet. Could have been a nice political element. (Or was that later in the books?)
--I wish there could have been more scenes in the Order of the Phoenix headquarters. I remember that place seeming so badass.
--What about Creecher's betrayal? And Hermione's speech about house elves are people too?
--What was with Kingsley Shacklebolt's "comedic" line, "Dumbledore's got style"? Um, yeah, he's a black wizard... we get it.
--I guess a couple of kids can just walk right into the Hall of Mysteries?
Elements of general awesomeness:
--The Ministry of Magic! I couldn't find any good pictures, but my google image search did return about a dozen picasa photos of kids in British phone booths with captions like, "Calling the Ministry of Magic."
--"Ellie" from About a Boy plays Tonks!
--I rented this movie for $1 because that's how much my video store charges for "kids' movies."
Final thought: Is there anyone left in the free world who still pretends they're too refined to like Harry Potter?
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
I am gonna have to disagree with you. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is not only the best HP film but is a good film in itself. Alfonoso Cuaron pwns Yates any day (didnt that dude do Four Weddings and a Funeral?)
I remember reading Phoenix thinking it would make a better movie. The climax in the ministry of magic is basically JK Rowling listing off cgi shots. And like you said, the book is a labored read.
And there is no better way to react to a main character dying except with a good Star Warsesque "Nooooooo!"
I remember seeing Goblet of Fire with you guys. Who did I see Phoenix with? I may never know.
I'm sure Cuaron is a better director but Order of the Phoenix is a better story. And Harry actually does go, "NOOOOO!" but there's no sound so it doesn't seem as lame as Star Wars. Just kidding.
I saw Phoenix with myself and I will never forget it.
At first I was going to say that I remembered seeing this movie and Mohua and Christina giggling the whole time. But then I realized that was Goblet and I have NO RECOLLECTION AT ALL of seeing Order. But I know I saw the movie itself, in theaters. Wow, it's like someone put an Obliviate charm on me or something. Also, Acree, do you know about this Twilight vampire phenomenon? Everyone calls it "the new Harry Potter." It makes me uncomfortable.
I just checked out Twilight, and I'm gonna say NOT the next HP. It doesn't have that parallel universe thing going for it, which I'm pretty sure is high on the list of requirements for fantasy becoming a worldwide craze.
Twilight really creeps me out. The NYT and Jezebel each did a peice about how it has this socially conservative, women are made for child-rearing thing, but I think what mostly pisses me off is how poorly written it is. I read a couple pages, and I swear, I haven't seen prose that purple since Clan of the Cave Bear.
P.S. Anyone ever read Clan of the Cave Bear? WEIRD. BOOK.
Also, the lack of CAPS LOCK HARRY in the Order of the Pheonix movie was a welcome surprise. I expected to hate it almost as much as I hated the book, but I enjoyed it a lot! The only problem was that I saw it in an IMAX screen in 3-D, and the 3-D glasses didn't fit over my real glasses. I kept switching between them, and got a headache. Oh, the curse of poor vision.
Now I remember! The Oblviate charm is broken. I saw it with V and Cydnebeara at the I-85 Death Star theater.
If the parallel universe thing equaled children fantasy success then The Golden Compass, aka the atheist Narnia, would have a sequel. 1,000 pages later and I cannot decide if this series is good.
I read the review for the last Twilight. Sounded pretty messed up. And the trailer for Twilight is super lame, looks like a bad WB series.
CAPS LOCK HARRY is a very useful term; thank you, Shoshi!
I haven't read the Golden Compass but I listened to a discussion of it on Mars Hill Audio (an intelligent Christian and cultural audio magazine). They said that the world element is really well-done and engaging, but that the story as a whole is heavy-handedly moralistic, preaching against the evils of authority, religion = slavery, DON'T JUST DO WHAT SOME BOOK TELLS YOU TO, etc.
Acree listening to progressive Christian radio! 1337!
Sheesh, even I thought His Dark Materials is too heavy handed with the anti-Christianity stuff. I mean (semi-SPOILER ALERT!) they go at war with heaven? Yikes. The books push an anti-Augustine philosophy of enjoying what some consider sinful. However, the movie removed any traces that could be offensive (other than being a generally bad movie, burn).
Post a Comment